Re: [PATCH] fix PR67700

2015-09-28 Thread H.J. Lu
On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 3:48 PM, Sebastian Paul Pop wrote: > I fixed this in a follow-up patch. > Now I got https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67754 FAIL: gcc.dg/graphite/interchange-10.c execution test FAIL: gcc.dg/graphite/interchange-11.c execution test FAIL: gcc.dg/graphite/interc

RE: [PATCH] fix PR67700

2015-09-28 Thread Sebastian Paul Pop
I fixed this in a follow-up patch. Sebastian -Original Message- From: H.J. Lu [mailto:hjl.to...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, September 28, 2015 2:39 PM To: Tobias Grosser Cc: Sebastian Pop; GCC Patches; Sebastian Pop; aditya...@samsung.com; Richard Biener Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix PR67700

Re: [PATCH] fix PR67700

2015-09-28 Thread H.J. Lu
On Sat, Sep 26, 2015 at 3:34 AM, Tobias Grosser wrote: > On 09/25/2015 10:39 PM, Sebastian Pop wrote: >> >> The patch makes the detection of scop parameters in >> parameter_index_in_region a >> bit more conservative by discarding scalar variables defined in function >> of data >> references define

Re: [PATCH] fix PR67700

2015-09-26 Thread Tobias Grosser
On 09/25/2015 10:39 PM, Sebastian Pop wrote: The patch makes the detection of scop parameters in parameter_index_in_region a bit more conservative by discarding scalar variables defined in function of data references defined in the scop. 2015-09-25 Aditya Kumar Sebastian Pop

[PATCH] fix PR67700

2015-09-25 Thread Sebastian Pop
The patch makes the detection of scop parameters in parameter_index_in_region a bit more conservative by discarding scalar variables defined in function of data references defined in the scop. 2015-09-25 Aditya Kumar Sebastian Pop PR tree-optimization/67700