Re: [ping] Re: [PATCH] dump_case_nodes: Treat unsigned as unsigned, don't ICE

2014-05-24 Thread Steven Bosscher
On Sat, May 24, 2014 at 4:25 PM, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > Ping? OK. Ciao! Steven > On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 10:58:27AM -0700, Segher Boessenkool wrote: >> The current code converts every tree to signed hwi; this ICEs with >> values not representable as shwi, like 999ULL in

[ping] Re: [PATCH] dump_case_nodes: Treat unsigned as unsigned, don't ICE

2014-05-24 Thread Segher Boessenkool
Ping? On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 10:58:27AM -0700, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > The current code converts every tree to signed hwi; this ICEs with > values not representable as shwi, like 999ULL in > pr34154.c (and if it didn't ICE, it would print the wrong value). > > This fixes it.

Re: [PATCH] dump_case_nodes: Treat unsigned as unsigned, don't ICE

2014-05-20 Thread Mike Stump
On May 20, 2014, at 10:58 AM, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > The current code converts every tree to signed hwi; this ICEs with > values not representable as shwi, like 999ULL Looks nice to me… Looks like the type of change I would have done for wide-int, if I had tripped on this.

[PATCH] dump_case_nodes: Treat unsigned as unsigned, don't ICE

2014-05-20 Thread Segher Boessenkool
The current code converts every tree to signed hwi; this ICEs with values not representable as shwi, like 999ULL in pr34154.c (and if it didn't ICE, it would print the wrong value). This fixes it. Bootstrapped and tested on powerpc64-linux. Okay to apply? Segher 2014-05-20 S