On Thu, 16 Feb 2023, Patrick Palka wrote:
> This fixes some header-defined functions that are undesirably declared
> static and weren't caught by the "^static inline" pattern used in the
> previous patch.
>
> gcc/ChangeLog:
>
> * hash-table.h (gt_pch_nx): Remove static.
> * lra-int.h
anually verified that none of these function definitions conflict
> with each other.
> Bootstrapping with objc enabled revealed a minor manual changed was
> needed in gcc/objc/objc-act.cc to avoid a redeclaration mismatch error.
>
> -- >8 --
>
> Subject: [PATCH] don't d
This fixes some header-defined functions that are undesirably declared
static and weren't caught by the "^static inline" pattern used in the
previous patch.
gcc/ChangeLog:
* hash-table.h (gt_pch_nx): Remove static.
* lra-int.h (lra_change_class): Likewise.
* recog.h (which
> 3) we have also gcc/ada/gcc-interface/*.h with
> ada.h:#define INLINE static inline
> gigi.h:static inline unsigned HOST_WIDE_INT
> gigi.h:static inline bool
> gigi.h:static inline bool
> gigi.h:static inline bool
> gigi.h:static inline tree
> gigi.h:static inline tree
> gigi.h:static inline tree
On Tue, Jan 31, 2023 at 9:43 AM Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jan 31, 2023 at 08:05:15AM +0100, Richard Biener via Gcc-patches
> wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 31, 2023 at 4:39 AM Patrick Palka via Gcc-patches
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Many functions defined in our headers are declared 'static inline' w
On Tue, Jan 31, 2023 at 08:05:15AM +0100, Richard Biener via Gcc-patches wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 31, 2023 at 4:39 AM Patrick Palka via Gcc-patches
> wrote:
> >
> > Many functions defined in our headers are declared 'static inline' which
> > is a vestige from when GCC's implementation language was C.
