On 2/18/19 11:52 AM, Martin Sebor wrote:
Index: gcc/doc/extend.texi
===
--- gcc/doc/extend.texi (revision 268992)
+++ gcc/doc/extend.texi (working copy)
@@ -12890,6 +12890,23 @@ built-in in this case, because it has no opportuni
opt
On 2/15/19 9:01 PM, Sandra Loosemore wrote:
On 2/13/19 4:33 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
Index: gcc/doc/extend.texi
===
--- gcc/doc/extend.texi (revision 268856)
+++ gcc/doc/extend.texi (working copy)
@@ -12890,6 +12890,22 @@ buil
On 2/13/19 4:33 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
Index: gcc/doc/extend.texi
===
--- gcc/doc/extend.texi (revision 268856)
+++ gcc/doc/extend.texi (working copy)
@@ -12890,6 +12890,22 @@ built-in in this case, because it has no opportuni
opt
The attached patch adds the __builtin_is_constant_evaluated newly
introduced in GCC 9 to the Other Builtins section in the manual.
I followed the example of __builtin_setjmp and __builtin_longjmp
by encouraging the use of std::is_constant_evaluated over making
use of the built-in directly.
There