On 01/04/2016 05:15 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
s/built-ins/builtins/ (like in the @refs you used previously)
I thought the @refs were an inconsistency and built-in was
the preferred spelling. That's what someone else pointed
out to me sometime ago and what I see documented in the GCC
Coding Conv
We just had a patch a month or so ago (r231022) to sort this table into
something approaching alphabetical order, module no- prefixes, I guess.
Can you please insert the new entry into a less random place?
Sure. It was meant to be inserted in the right place, my brain
just filtered out the "i
On 01/04/2016 03:17 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
As discussed in c/69104, the -Winvalid-memory-model option is
not documented in the manual. The attached patch rectifies that.
Thanks for tackling this.
Index: doc/invoke.texi
===
---
As discussed in c/69104, the -Winvalid-memory-model option is
not documented in the manual. The attached patch rectifies that.
Martin
gcc/ChangeLog:
2016-01-04 Martin Sebor
* doc/invoke.texi (Warning Options): Document -Winvalid-memory-model.
Index: doc/invoke.texi
