Re: [PATCH] docs: Suggest options to improve ASAN stack traces

On Thu, Dec 08, 2022 at 09:11:54AM -0500, Marek Polacek via Gcc-patches wrote: > On Thu, Dec 08, 2022 at 08:25:26AM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote: > > * Marek Polacek via Gcc-patches: > > > > > diff --git a/gcc/doc/invoke.texi b/gcc/doc/invoke.texi > > > index 726392409b6..2de14466dd3 100644 > > > -

Re: [PATCH] docs: Suggest options to improve ASAN stack traces

On Thu, Dec 08, 2022 at 08:25:26AM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote: > * Marek Polacek via Gcc-patches: > > > diff --git a/gcc/doc/invoke.texi b/gcc/doc/invoke.texi > > index 726392409b6..2de14466dd3 100644 > > --- a/gcc/doc/invoke.texi > > +++ b/gcc/doc/invoke.texi > > @@ -16510,6 +16510,14 @@ The opt

Re: [PATCH] docs: Suggest options to improve ASAN stack traces

* Marek Polacek via Gcc-patches: > diff --git a/gcc/doc/invoke.texi b/gcc/doc/invoke.texi > index 726392409b6..2de14466dd3 100644 > --- a/gcc/doc/invoke.texi > +++ b/gcc/doc/invoke.texi > @@ -16510,6 +16510,14 @@ The option cannot be combined with > @option{-fsanitize=thread} or > @option{-fsani

[PATCH] docs: Suggest options to improve ASAN stack traces

I got a complaint that while Clang docs suggest options that improve the quality of the backtraces ASAN prints (cf. ), our docs don't say anything to that effect. This patch amends that with a new paragraph. (It deliberately doesn't mention