Re: [PATCH] doc: explicitly say 'lifetime' for DCE

Richard Biener writes: > On Thu, Nov 2, 2023 at 11:25 AM Sam James wrote: >> >> >> Richard Biener writes: >> >> > On Thu, Nov 2, 2023 at 10:03 AM Sam James wrote: >> >> >> >> Say 'memory lifetime' rather than 'memory life' as lifetime is the more >> >> standard term nowadays (indeed we have

Re: [PATCH] doc: explicitly say 'lifetime' for DCE

On Thu, Nov 2, 2023 at 11:25 AM Sam James wrote: > > > Richard Biener writes: > > > On Thu, Nov 2, 2023 at 10:03 AM Sam James wrote: > >> > >> Say 'memory lifetime' rather than 'memory life' as lifetime is the more > >> standard term nowadays (indeed we have e.g. -fno-lifetime-dse). > >> > >> It

Re: [PATCH] doc: explicitly say 'lifetime' for DCE

Richard Biener writes: > On Thu, Nov 2, 2023 at 10:03 AM Sam James wrote: >> >> Say 'memory lifetime' rather than 'memory life' as lifetime is the more >> standard term nowadays (indeed we have e.g. -fno-lifetime-dse). >> >> It's also easier to grep for if someone is looking for the documentat

Re: [PATCH] doc: explicitly say 'lifetime' for DCE

On Thu, Nov 2, 2023 at 10:03 AM Sam James wrote: > > Say 'memory lifetime' rather than 'memory life' as lifetime is the more > standard term nowadays (indeed we have e.g. -fno-lifetime-dse). > > It's also easier to grep for if someone is looking for the documentation on > where we do that. OK >

[PATCH] doc: explicitly say 'lifetime' for DCE

Say 'memory lifetime' rather than 'memory life' as lifetime is the more standard term nowadays (indeed we have e.g. -fno-lifetime-dse). It's also easier to grep for if someone is looking for the documentation on where we do that. gcc/ChangeLog: * doc/passes.texi (Dead code elimination): Expli