On 07/26/2018 05:18 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 12:29 PM Alexander Monakov wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> when using explicit register variables ('register int foo asm("%ebp");'),
>> using const/volatile type qualifiers on the declaration does not result in
>> the logically expecte
On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 12:29 PM Alexander Monakov wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> when using explicit register variables ('register int foo asm("%ebp");'),
> using const/volatile type qualifiers on the declaration does not result in
> the logically expected effect.
>
> The main issue is that gcc-8 got "better
Hi,
when using explicit register variables ('register int foo asm("%ebp");'),
using const/volatile type qualifiers on the declaration does not result in
the logically expected effect.
The main issue is that gcc-8 got "better" at propagating initializers of
'register const' variables to their uses
