On Thu, Apr 28, 2022 at 10:46:17AM +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> IIUC this text is not true (maybe it was back in 2018?)
Initially I thought the way to transition to IEEE 128-bit long double would be
through multilibs, but we never installed multilibs for the different long
double types. So yea
On Thu, Apr 28, 2022 at 10:46:17AM +0100, Jonathan Wakely via Gcc-patches wrote:
> IIUC this text is not true (maybe it was back in 2018?)
>
> OK for trunk?
>
> Which branches should it be on too, all of them?
>
> -- >8 --
>
> The choice of ieee or ibm long double format is orthogonal to multil
IIUC this text is not true (maybe it was back in 2018?)
OK for trunk?
Which branches should it be on too, all of them?
-- >8 --
The choice of ieee or ibm long double format is orthogonal to multilibs,
as the two sets of symbols co-exist and don't need a separate multilib.
gcc/ChangeLog:
