Applied to master, thanks!
--Philipp.
On Mon, 7 Aug 2023 at 19:20, Jeff Law wrote:
>
>
>
> On 8/7/23 05:31, Manolis Tsamis wrote:
> > The stack pointer propagation fix 736f8fd3 turned out to be more restrictive
> > than needed by rejecting propagation of the stack pointer when REG_POINTER
> > di
On 8/7/23 05:31, Manolis Tsamis wrote:
The stack pointer propagation fix 736f8fd3 turned out to be more restrictive
than needed by rejecting propagation of the stack pointer when REG_POINTER
didn't match.
This commit removes this check:
When the stack pointer is propagated it is fine for this
The stack pointer propagation fix 736f8fd3 turned out to be more restrictive
than needed by rejecting propagation of the stack pointer when REG_POINTER
didn't match.
This commit removes this check:
When the stack pointer is propagated it is fine for this to result in
REG_POINTER becoming true from
