On 3/14/21 8:25 PM, Iain Sandoe wrote:
Hi
Although there is still some discussion in CWG2451 on this, the
implementors are agreed on the intent (thus it is wording that is
expected to change - the implementations should be brought into
sync).
tested on x86_64-darwin, x86_64-linux-gnu and with c
Hi
Although there is still some discussion in CWG2451 on this, the
implementors are agreed on the intent (thus it is wording that is
expected to change - the implementations should be brought into
sync).
tested on x86_64-darwin, x86_64-linux-gnu and with cppcoro and
folly/coroutines.
OK for mast