Re: [PATCH] coroutines: Handle lambda capture objects in the way as clang.

Iain Sandoe wrote: > Nathan Sidwell wrote: > >> On 4/22/20 8:48 AM, Iain Sandoe wrote: >>> Hi, >>> There is no PR for this, at present, but the implementation of >>> clang and GCC's handling of lambda capture object implicit parms >>> is currently different. There is still some discussion abou

Re: [PATCH] coroutines: Handle lambda capture objects in the way as clang.

Nathan Sidwell wrote: On 4/22/20 8:48 AM, Iain Sandoe wrote: Hi, There is no PR for this, at present, but the implementation of clang and GCC's handling of lambda capture object implicit parms is currently different. There is still some discussion about 'correct' interpretation of the standar

Re: [PATCH] coroutines: Handle lambda capture objects in the way as clang.

On 4/22/20 8:48 AM, Iain Sandoe wrote: Hi, There is no PR for this, at present, but the implementation of clang and GCC's handling of lambda capture object implicit parms is currently different. There is still some discussion about 'correct' interpretation of the standard - but in the short-ter

[PATCH] coroutines: Handle lambda capture objects in the way as clang.

Hi, There is no PR for this, at present, but the implementation of clang and GCC's handling of lambda capture object implicit parms is currently different. There is still some discussion about 'correct' interpretation of the standard - but in the short-term it is probably best to have consistent