On 10/09/2025 14:06, Jeff Law wrote:
>
>
> On 9/10/25 4:23 AM, Iain Sandoe wrote:
>
>> Now we have this facility - and it is firing on my testboxes (since i use
>> this
>> script to post-process [per .sum file for stability]) - I looked through a
>> few of
>> the reported cases and they seem g
If the results include several configurations (schedule of
variations), do not report summary lines as duplicates. Indeed with
several configurations, it's likely that the results contain the same
# of expected passesX
The patch just keeps lines starting with test state prefix
On 9/10/25 4:23 AM, Iain Sandoe wrote:
Now we have this facility - and it is firing on my testboxes (since i use this
script to post-process [per .sum file for stability]) - I looked through a few
of
the reported cases and they seem genuiene - but particularly in respect of
dg-final ones, ha
> From: Jiang, Haochen
> Sent: Monday, September 15, 2025 11:34 AM
>
> > From: Jiang, Haochen
> > Sent: Monday, September 15, 2025 11:17 AM
> >
> > > From: Richard Earnshaw (lists)
> > > Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2025 1:24 AM
> > >
> > > On 10/09/2025 14:06, Jeff Law wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
>
> On 15 Sep 2025, at 10:00, Jiang, Haochen wrote:
>
>> From: Jiang, Haochen
>> Sent: Monday, September 15, 2025 11:34 AM
>>
>>> From: Jiang, Haochen
>>> Sent: Monday, September 15, 2025 11:17 AM
>>>
From: Richard Earnshaw (lists)
Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2025 1:24 AM
>>
> From: Jiang, Haochen
> Sent: Monday, September 15, 2025 11:17 AM
>
> > From: Richard Earnshaw (lists)
> > Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2025 1:24 AM
> >
> > On 10/09/2025 14:06, Jeff Law wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > On 9/10/25 4:23 AM, Iain Sandoe wrote:
> > >
> > >> Now we have this facility - and
On 10/09/2025 20:03, David Malcolm wrote:
> On Wed, 2025-09-10 at 18:23 +0100, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote:
>> On 10/09/2025 14:06, Jeff Law wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 9/10/25 4:23 AM, Iain Sandoe wrote:
>>>
Now we have this facility - and it is firing on my testboxes
(since i use this
On Wed, 2025-09-10 at 18:23 +0100, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote:
> On 10/09/2025 14:06, Jeff Law wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 9/10/25 4:23 AM, Iain Sandoe wrote:
> >
> > > Now we have this facility - and it is firing on my testboxes
> > > (since i use this
> > > script to post-process [per .sum file
On Wed, 10 Sept 2025 at 15:41, Iain Sandoe wrote:
>
>
>
> > On 10 Sep 2025, at 13:42, Christophe Lyon
> > wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 10 Sept 2025 at 12:23, Iain Sandoe wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>> On 10 Sep 2025, at 11:12, Richard Earnshaw (lists)
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On 10/09/2025 10:54, Chri
> On 10 Sep 2025, at 14:06, Jeff Law wrote:
> ]
> On 9/10/25 4:23 AM, Iain Sandoe wrote:
>
>> Now we have this facility - and it is firing on my testboxes (since i use
>> this
>> script to post-process [per .sum file for stability]) - I looked through a
>> few of
>> the reported cases and th
> On 10 Sep 2025, at 13:42, Christophe Lyon wrote:
>
> On Wed, 10 Sept 2025 at 12:23, Iain Sandoe wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>> On 10 Sep 2025, at 11:12, Richard Earnshaw (lists)
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 10/09/2025 10:54, Christophe Lyon wrote:
If the results include several configurations (sch
On Wed, 10 Sept 2025 at 12:23, Iain Sandoe wrote:
>
>
>
> > On 10 Sep 2025, at 11:12, Richard Earnshaw (lists)
> > wrote:
> >
> > On 10/09/2025 10:54, Christophe Lyon wrote:
> >> If the results include several configurations (schedule of
> >> variations), do not report summary lines as duplicate
On 10/09/2025 10:54, Christophe Lyon wrote:
> If the results include several configurations (schedule of
> variations), do not report summary lines as duplicates. Indeed with
> several configurations, it's likely that the results contain the same
>
># of expected passesX
>
>
> On 10 Sep 2025, at 11:12, Richard Earnshaw (lists)
> wrote:
>
> On 10/09/2025 10:54, Christophe Lyon wrote:
>> If the results include several configurations (schedule of
>> variations), do not report summary lines as duplicates. Indeed with
>> several configurations, it's likely that the r
14 matches
Mail list logo
