On 14/09/2011, at 7:40 AM, Maxim Kuvyrkov wrote:
>
> OK then, attached is the trivial patch that removes
> haifa-sched.c:check_cfg(). Please let me know if you have strong feelings
> towards keeping check_cfg().
>
> Tested on x86_64-linux-gnu. Absent any requests to the contrary, I will
> ch
On 9/09/2011, at 6:54 AM, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
> On 09/06/11 23:56, Maxim Kuvyrkov wrote:
>> I agree. I would rather remove the entirety of haifa-sched.c:
>> check_cfg(); scheduler is not the right place for checking
>> consistency of CFG. Check_cfg() was useful for debugging scheduler
>> patche
On 09/06/11 23:56, Maxim Kuvyrkov wrote:
> I agree. I would rather remove the entirety of haifa-sched.c:
> check_cfg(); scheduler is not the right place for checking
> consistency of CFG. Check_cfg() was useful for debugging scheduler
> patches, but now it is more of maintainance overhead.
>
> D
On 7/09/2011, at 9:32 AM, Steven Bosscher wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 11:31 PM, Steven Bosscher
> wrote:
>> Index: haifa-sched.c
>> ===
>> --- haifa-sched.c (revision 178601)
>> +++ haifa-sched.c (working copy)
>> @@
On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 11:31 PM, Steven Bosscher wrote:
> Index: haifa-sched.c
> ===
> --- haifa-sched.c (revision 178601)
> +++ haifa-sched.c (working copy)
> @@ -6071,7 +6071,10 @@ check_cfg (rtx head, rtx tail)
>
On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 8:00 PM, Maxim Kuvyrkov wrote:
>
> On 7/09/2011, at 3:13 AM, Steven Bosscher wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 11:14 AM, Tom de Vries wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> During testing the approved-for-commit middle-end patch for bug 43864 on
>>> ARM, I
>>> ran into a gcc.dg/torture/p
On 7/09/2011, at 3:13 AM, Steven Bosscher wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 11:14 AM, Tom de Vries wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> During testing the approved-for-commit middle-end patch for bug 43864 on
>> ARM, I
>> ran into a gcc.dg/torture/pr46068.c ICE.
>>
>> The following assert in haifa-sched.c:check
On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 11:14 AM, Tom de Vries wrote:
> Hi,
>
> During testing the approved-for-commit middle-end patch for bug 43864 on ARM,
> I
> ran into a gcc.dg/torture/pr46068.c ICE.
>
> The following assert in haifa-sched.c:check_cfg triggered:
> ...
> else if (any_condjump
Hi,
During testing the approved-for-commit middle-end patch for bug 43864 on ARM, I
ran into a gcc.dg/torture/pr46068.c ICE.
The following assert in haifa-sched.c:check_cfg triggered:
...
else if (any_condjump_p (head))
gcc_assert (/* Usual case. */
