> On Thu, Apr 28, 2022 at 01:54:51PM +0200, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> > > --- gcc/cgraph.cc.jj 2022-04-20 09:24:12.194579146 +0200
> > > +++ gcc/cgraph.cc 2022-04-27 11:53:52.102173154 +0200
> > > @@ -3488,7 +3488,9 @@ cgraph_node::verify_node (void)
> > >"returns a pointer");
> > >
On Thu, Apr 28, 2022 at 01:54:51PM +0200, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> > --- gcc/cgraph.cc.jj2022-04-20 09:24:12.194579146 +0200
> > +++ gcc/cgraph.cc 2022-04-27 11:53:52.102173154 +0200
> > @@ -3488,7 +3488,9 @@ cgraph_node::verify_node (void)
> > "returns a pointer");
> >error_
Hello,
> Hi!
>
> The following testcase ICEs, because the ctors during cc1plus all have
> !opt_for_fn (decl, flag_semantic_interposition) - they have NULL
> DECL_FUNCTION_SPECIFIC_OPTIMIZATION (decl) and optimization_default_node
> is for -Ofast and so has flag_semantic_interposition cleared.
> Du
On Thu, 28 Apr 2022, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> The following testcase ICEs, because the ctors during cc1plus all have
> !opt_for_fn (decl, flag_semantic_interposition) - they have NULL
> DECL_FUNCTION_SPECIFIC_OPTIMIZATION (decl) and optimization_default_node
> is for -Ofast and so has flag_
Hi!
The following testcase ICEs, because the ctors during cc1plus all have
!opt_for_fn (decl, flag_semantic_interposition) - they have NULL
DECL_FUNCTION_SPECIFIC_OPTIMIZATION (decl) and optimization_default_node
is for -Ofast and so has flag_semantic_interposition cleared.
During free lang data,