On 05/03/2017 07:32 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 3:50 PM, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
Looks ok to me. The new function name 'type_hash_default' is a little
odd, maybe
name it type_hash_canon_hash instead?
sure. I think when I originally broke it out, I didn't know it would e
On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 3:50 PM, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
> On the modules branch, I need rematerialize canonical types and the like
> from a read-in serialized tree.
>
> I discovered the canonical-type hash table is fed a bespoke hash value by
> each type creator. There was no generic type hasher :(
On the modules branch, I need rematerialize canonical types and the like
from a read-in serialized tree.
I discovered the canonical-type hash table is fed a bespoke hash value
by each type creator. There was no generic type hasher :( The rationale
appears to allow each type constuctor to just
