Re: [PATCH] c-family: Improve location for -Wunknown-pragmas in a _Pragma [PR118838]

On Mon, Apr 07, 2025 at 01:58:08PM -0400, Marek Polacek wrote: > On Wed, Feb 12, 2025 at 08:27:37PM -0500, Lewis Hyatt wrote: > > Hello- > > > > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118838 > > > > This patch addresses the issue mentioned in the PR (another instance of > > _Pragma string l

Re: [PATCH] c-family: Improve location for -Wunknown-pragmas in a _Pragma [PR118838]

On Wed, Feb 12, 2025 at 08:27:37PM -0500, Lewis Hyatt wrote: > Hello- > > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118838 > > This patch addresses the issue mentioned in the PR (another instance of > _Pragma string location issues). bootstrap + regtest all languages on > aarch64 looks good. I

ping: [PATCH] c-family: Improve location for -Wunknown-pragmas in a _Pragma [PR118838]

Hello- May I please ping this patch? Thanks! https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2025-February/675645.html -Lewis On Wed, Feb 12, 2025 at 8:27 PM Lewis Hyatt wrote: > > Hello- > > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118838 > > This patch addresses the issue mentioned in the PR (a

[PATCH] c-family: Improve location for -Wunknown-pragmas in a _Pragma [PR118838]

Hello- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118838 This patch addresses the issue mentioned in the PR (another instance of _Pragma string location issues). bootstrap + regtest all languages on aarch64 looks good. Is it OK please for now or for stage 1? Note, it is not a regression, since