* Jakub Jelinek:
> On Thu, Nov 24, 2022 at 11:01:40AM +0100, Florian Weimer via Gcc-patches
> wrote:
>> * Joseph Myers:
>>
>> > On Tue, 22 Nov 2022, Florian Weimer via Gcc-patches wrote:
>> >
>> >> Without this change, finish_declspecs cannot tell that whether there
>> >> was an erroneous type s
On Thu, Nov 24, 2022 at 11:01:40AM +0100, Florian Weimer via Gcc-patches wrote:
> * Joseph Myers:
>
> > On Tue, 22 Nov 2022, Florian Weimer via Gcc-patches wrote:
> >
> >> Without this change, finish_declspecs cannot tell that whether there
> >> was an erroneous type specified, or no type at all.
* Joseph Myers:
> On Tue, 22 Nov 2022, Florian Weimer via Gcc-patches wrote:
>
>> Without this change, finish_declspecs cannot tell that whether there
>> was an erroneous type specified, or no type at all. This may result
>> in additional diagnostics for implicit ints, or missing diagnostics
>> f
On Tue, 22 Nov 2022, Florian Weimer via Gcc-patches wrote:
> Without this change, finish_declspecs cannot tell that whether there
> was an erroneous type specified, or no type at all. This may result
> in additional diagnostics for implicit ints, or missing diagnostics
> for multiple types.
>
>
Without this change, finish_declspecs cannot tell that whether there
was an erroneous type specified, or no type at all. This may result
in additional diagnostics for implicit ints, or missing diagnostics
for multiple types.
PR c/107805
gcc/c/
* c-decl.cc (declspecs_add_type): Pr
