On Wed, 28 Jul 2021, Joseph Myers wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Jul 2021, Jakub Jelinek via Gcc-patches wrote:
>
> > I wonder if instead when trying to wrap
> > C_MAYBE_CONST_EXPR into a VIEW_CONVERT_EXPR we shouldn't be
> > removing that C_MAYBE_CONST_EXPR and perhaps adding it around the
> > VIEW_CONVERT
On Wed, 21 Jul 2021, Jakub Jelinek via Gcc-patches wrote:
> I wonder if instead when trying to wrap
> C_MAYBE_CONST_EXPR into a VIEW_CONVERT_EXPR we shouldn't be
> removing that C_MAYBE_CONST_EXPR and perhaps adding it around the
> VIEW_CONVERT_EXPR. E.g. various routines in c/c-typeck.c like
> b
On Wed, 21 Jul 2021, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 21, 2021 at 10:06:51AM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
> > c_common_mark_addressable_vec fails to look through C_MAYBE_CONST_EXPR
> > in the case it isn't at the toplevel.
> >
> > Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, OK?
> >
>
On Wed, Jul 21, 2021 at 10:06:51AM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
> c_common_mark_addressable_vec fails to look through C_MAYBE_CONST_EXPR
> in the case it isn't at the toplevel.
>
> Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, OK?
>
> Thanks,
> Richard.
>
> 2021-07-21 Richard Biener
>
c_common_mark_addressable_vec fails to look through C_MAYBE_CONST_EXPR
in the case it isn't at the toplevel.
Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, OK?
Thanks,
Richard.
2021-07-21 Richard Biener
PR c/101512
gcc/c-family/
* c-common.c (c_common_mark_addressable_v
