Re: [PATCH] c++: wrong looser exception spec with deleted fn

On 2/15/24 17:16, Marek Polacek wrote: Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, ok for trunk? IMHO trivial enough to go ahead now seeing as it doesn't introduce new errors. OK. -- >8 -- I noticed we don't implement the "unless the overriding function is defined as deleted" wording adde

[PATCH] c++: wrong looser exception spec with deleted fn

Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, ok for trunk? IMHO trivial enough to go ahead now seeing as it doesn't introduce new errors. -- >8 -- I noticed we don't implement the "unless the overriding function is defined as deleted" wording added to [except.spec] via CWG 1351. DR 135