Re: [PATCH] c++: unifying specializations of non-primary tmpls [PR120161]

On 5/14/25 4:48 PM, Patrick Palka wrote: On Wed, 14 May 2025, Patrick Palka wrote: On Wed, 14 May 2025, Jason Merrill wrote: On 5/14/25 2:44 PM, Patrick Palka wrote: On Wed, 14 May 2025, Patrick Palka wrote: On Wed, 14 May 2025, Jason Merrill wrote: On 5/12/25 7:53 PM, Patrick Palka wrot

Re: [PATCH] c++: unifying specializations of non-primary tmpls [PR120161]

On Wed, 14 May 2025, Patrick Palka wrote: > On Wed, 14 May 2025, Jason Merrill wrote: > > > On 5/14/25 2:44 PM, Patrick Palka wrote: > > > On Wed, 14 May 2025, Patrick Palka wrote: > > > > > > > On Wed, 14 May 2025, Jason Merrill wrote: > > > > > > > > > On 5/12/25 7:53 PM, Patrick Palka wrote:

Re: [PATCH] c++: unifying specializations of non-primary tmpls [PR120161]

On Wed, 14 May 2025, Jason Merrill wrote: > On 5/14/25 2:44 PM, Patrick Palka wrote: > > On Wed, 14 May 2025, Patrick Palka wrote: > > > > > On Wed, 14 May 2025, Jason Merrill wrote: > > > > > > > On 5/12/25 7:53 PM, Patrick Palka wrote: > > > > > Bootstrapped and regtested on x86-64-pc-linux-gn

Re: [PATCH] c++: unifying specializations of non-primary tmpls [PR120161]

On 5/14/25 2:44 PM, Patrick Palka wrote: On Wed, 14 May 2025, Patrick Palka wrote: On Wed, 14 May 2025, Jason Merrill wrote: On 5/12/25 7:53 PM, Patrick Palka wrote: Bootstrapped and regtested on x86-64-pc-linux-gnu, does this look OK for trunk/15/14? -- >8 -- Here unification of P=Wrap::t

Re: [PATCH] c++: unifying specializations of non-primary tmpls [PR120161]

On Wed, 14 May 2025, Patrick Palka wrote: > On Wed, 14 May 2025, Jason Merrill wrote: > > > On 5/12/25 7:53 PM, Patrick Palka wrote: > > > Bootstrapped and regtested on x86-64-pc-linux-gnu, does this look OK > > > for trunk/15/14? > > > > > > -- >8 -- > > > > > > Here unification of P=Wrap::typ

Re: [PATCH] c++: unifying specializations of non-primary tmpls [PR120161]

On Wed, 14 May 2025, Jason Merrill wrote: > On 5/12/25 7:53 PM, Patrick Palka wrote: > > Bootstrapped and regtested on x86-64-pc-linux-gnu, does this look OK > > for trunk/15/14? > > > > -- >8 -- > > > > Here unification of P=Wrap::type, A=Wrap::type wrongly > > succeeds ever since r14-4112 whic

Re: [PATCH] c++: unifying specializations of non-primary tmpls [PR120161]

On 5/12/25 7:53 PM, Patrick Palka wrote: Bootstrapped and regtested on x86-64-pc-linux-gnu, does this look OK for trunk/15/14? -- >8 -- Here unification of P=Wrap::type, A=Wrap::type wrongly succeeds ever since r14-4112 which made the RECORD_TYPE case of unify no longer recurse into template ar

[PATCH] c++: unifying specializations of non-primary tmpls [PR120161]

Bootstrapped and regtested on x86-64-pc-linux-gnu, does this look OK for trunk/15/14? -- >8 -- Here unification of P=Wrap::type, A=Wrap::type wrongly succeeds ever since r14-4112 which made the RECORD_TYPE case of unify no longer recurse into template arguments for non-primary templates (since th