On Sun, Sep 12, 2021 at 10:29 PM Jason Merrill wrote:
>
> On 9/12/21 7:48 PM, Patrick Palka wrote:
> > On Thu, 2 Sep 2021, Jason Merrill wrote:
> >
> >> On 8/30/21 10:05 PM, Patrick Palka wrote:
> >>> Here when partially substituting into the pack expansion, substitution
> >>> into the constexpr i
On 9/12/21 7:48 PM, Patrick Palka wrote:
On Thu, 2 Sep 2021, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 8/30/21 10:05 PM, Patrick Palka wrote:
Here when partially substituting into the pack expansion, substitution
into the constexpr if yields a still-dependent tree, so tsubst_expr
returns an IF_STMT with an unsu
On Thu, 2 Sep 2021, Jason Merrill wrote:
> On 8/30/21 10:05 PM, Patrick Palka wrote:
> > Here when partially substituting into the pack expansion, substitution
> > into the constexpr if yields a still-dependent tree, so tsubst_expr
> > returns an IF_STMT with an unsubstituted IF_COND and with
> >
On 8/30/21 10:05 PM, Patrick Palka wrote:
Here when partially substituting into the pack expansion, substitution
into the constexpr if yields a still-dependent tree, so tsubst_expr
returns an IF_STMT with an unsubstituted IF_COND and with
IF_STMT_EXTRA_ARGS added to. Hence after partial substitu
Here when partially substituting into the pack expansion, substitution
into the constexpr if yields a still-dependent tree, so tsubst_expr
returns an IF_STMT with an unsubstituted IF_COND and with
IF_STMT_EXTRA_ARGS added to. Hence after partial substitution
the pack expansion pattern still refers
