Re: [PATCH] c++: normalizing ttp parm constraints [PR115656]

2024-07-23 Thread Jason Merrill
On 7/23/24 9:37 AM, Patrick Palka wrote: On Tue, 23 Jul 2024, Jason Merrill wrote: On 7/5/24 12:18 PM, Patrick Palka wrote: Bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, does this look OK for trunk/14 and perhaps 13? Alternatively we can set current_template_parms from weakly_subsumes in

Re: [PATCH] c++: normalizing ttp parm constraints [PR115656]

2024-07-23 Thread Patrick Palka
On Tue, 23 Jul 2024, Jason Merrill wrote: > On 7/5/24 12:18 PM, Patrick Palka wrote: > > Bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, does this look OK > > for trunk/14 and perhaps 13? > > > > Alternatively we can set current_template_parms from weakly_subsumes > > instead, who has only one

Re: [PATCH] c++: normalizing ttp parm constraints [PR115656]

2024-07-23 Thread Jason Merrill
On 7/5/24 12:18 PM, Patrick Palka wrote: Bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, does this look OK for trunk/14 and perhaps 13? Alternatively we can set current_template_parms from weakly_subsumes instead, who has only one caller anyway. Would it also work to pass tmpl instead of NU

Re: [PATCH] c++: normalizing ttp parm constraints [PR115656]

2024-07-19 Thread Patrick Palka
On Fri, Jul 5, 2024 at 12:18 PM Patrick Palka wrote: > > Bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, does this look OK > for trunk/14 and perhaps 13? > > Alternatively we can set current_template_parms from weakly_subsumes > instead, who has only one caller anyway. Ping. > > -- >8 -- > >

[PATCH] c++: normalizing ttp parm constraints [PR115656]

2024-07-05 Thread Patrick Palka
Bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, does this look OK for trunk/14 and perhaps 13? Alternatively we can set current_template_parms from weakly_subsumes instead, who has only one caller anyway. -- >8 -- Here we normalize the constraint same_as for the first time during constraint s