Re: [PATCH] c++: missing SFINAE for consteval calls [PR104620]

On 3/24/22 10:32, Patrick Palka wrote: Here we weren't respecting SFINAE when evaluating a substituted call to a consteval function, which caused us to reject the new testcase below. This patch fixes this by making build_over_call use the SFINAE-friendly version of cxx_constant_value. This chang

[PATCH] c++: missing SFINAE for consteval calls [PR104620]

Here we weren't respecting SFINAE when evaluating a substituted call to a consteval function, which caused us to reject the new testcase below. This patch fixes this by making build_over_call use the SFINAE-friendly version of cxx_constant_value. This change causes us to no longer diagnose ahead o