On 8/20/24 11:52 AM, Patrick Palka wrote:
Bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, does this look
OK for trunk only?
OK.
-- >8 --
Extending the PR113063 testcase to additionally constant evaluate the <=>
expression causes us to trip over the assert in cxx_eval_call_expression
/
Bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, does this look
OK for trunk only?
-- >8 --
Extending the PR113063 testcase to additionally constant evaluate the <=>
expression causes us to trip over the assert in cxx_eval_call_expression
/* We used to shortcut trivial constructor/op= here,