On 9/21/23 11:53, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 9/20/23 10:13, Patrick Palka wrote:
On Tue, 19 Sep 2023, Patrick Palka wrote:
On Tue, 19 Sep 2023, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 9/19/23 12:40, Patrick Palka wrote:
Tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, does this look OK for trunk/13?
OK for trunk. What's you
On 9/20/23 10:13, Patrick Palka wrote:
On Tue, 19 Sep 2023, Patrick Palka wrote:
On Tue, 19 Sep 2023, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 9/19/23 12:40, Patrick Palka wrote:
Tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, does this look OK for trunk/13?
OK for trunk. What's your argument for backporting?
Thanks. I
On Tue, 19 Sep 2023, Patrick Palka wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Sep 2023, Jason Merrill wrote:
>
> > On 9/19/23 12:40, Patrick Palka wrote:
> > > Tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, does this look OK for trunk/13?
> >
> > OK for trunk. What's your argument for backporting?
>
> Thanks. I don't feel strongly
On Tue, 19 Sep 2023, Jason Merrill wrote:
> On 9/19/23 12:40, Patrick Palka wrote:
> > Tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, does this look OK for trunk/13?
>
> OK for trunk. What's your argument for backporting?
Thanks. I don't feel strongly about it, but I was thinking that since
we typically backp
On 9/19/23 12:40, Patrick Palka wrote:
Tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, does this look OK for trunk/13?
OK for trunk. What's your argument for backporting?
-- >8 --
1. Move class NTTP object pretty printing to a more general spot in
the pretty printer.
2. Print the type of an class NTTP o
Tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, does this look OK for trunk/13?
-- >8 --
1. Move class NTTP object pretty printing to a more general spot in
the pretty printer.
2. Print the type of an class NTTP object alongside its CONSTRUCTOR
value, like dump_expr would have done.
3. Don't pretty print co
