On Sat, Jan 15, 2022 at 3:28 AM Anthony Sharp
wrote:
> Hi Jason,
>
> Hope you are well. Apologies, I've not had time to sit down and look at
> this since last month I quit my old job, then I had family around for the
> whole of the Christmas period, and then even more recently I've had to
> start
Hi Jason,
Hope you are well. Apologies, I've not had time to sit down and look at
this since last month I quit my old job, then I had family around for the
whole of the Christmas period, and then even more recently I've had to
start my new job.
In any case happy that you managed to figure it all
On 12/9/21 10:51, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 12/4/21 12:23, Anthony Sharp wrote:
Hi Jason,
Hope you are well. Apologies for not coming back sooner.
>I'd put it just above the definition of saved_token_sentinel in
parser.c.
Sounds good, done.
>Maybe cp_parser_require_end_of_template_paramete
On 12/4/21 12:23, Anthony Sharp wrote:
Hi Jason,
Hope you are well. Apologies for not coming back sooner.
>I'd put it just above the definition of saved_token_sentinel in parser.c.
Sounds good, done.
>Maybe cp_parser_require_end_of_template_parameter_list? Either way is
fine.
Even bette
Hi Jason,
Hope you are well. Apologies for not coming back sooner.
>I'd put it just above the definition of saved_token_sentinel in parser.c.
Sounds good, done.
>Maybe cp_parser_require_end_of_template_parameter_list? Either way is
fine.
Even better, have changed it.
>Hmm, good point; operat
On 10/10/21 07:28, Anthony Sharp wrote:
Hi Jason,
Hope you are well. Thanks for the feedback.
I like adding the configurability, but I think let's keep committing as
the default behavior. And adding the parameter to the rollback function
seems unnecessary. For the behavior argumen
hours even
with -j 12. Maybe I ought to think about getting a dedicated Linux PC.
Patch should be attached.
Kind regards,
Anthony
On Wed, 22 Sept 2021 at 21:04, Jason Merrill wrote:
> On 9/17/21 18:22, Anthony Sharp wrote:
> > And also re-attaching the patch!
> >
> > On Fri, 17 Sept 2021
for dependent template members [PR70417]
To: Jason Merrill
Hi Jason! Apologies for the delay.
This is basically core issue 1835, http://wg21.link/cwg1835
This was changed for C++23 by the paper "Declarations and where to find
them", http://wg21.link/p1787
Interesting, I was no
And also re-attaching the patch!
On Fri, 17 Sept 2021 at 23:17, Anthony Sharp wrote:
>
> Re-adding gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org.
>
> -- Forwarded message -
> From: Anthony Sharp
> Date: Fri, 17 Sept 2021 at 23:11
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] c++: error message f
Re-adding gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org.
-- Forwarded message -
From: Anthony Sharp
Date: Fri, 17 Sept 2021 at 23:11
Subject: Re: [PATCH] c++: error message for dependent template members [PR70417]
To: Jason Merrill
Hi Jason! Apologies for the delay.
> This is basically core is
On 8/20/21 12:56 PM, Anthony Sharp via Gcc-patches wrote:
Hi, hope everyone is well. I have a patch here for issue 70417
(https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70417). I'm still a GCC
noob, and this is probably the hardest thing I have ever coded in my
life, so please forgive any initial m
performance improvement - I don't really have the high-level
experience to be able to judge whether that is worth the increased
code complexity or not, so I just went with my gut.
Please find patch attached :)
Kind regards,
Anthony Sharp
From 0316e821607f6875293a664ab181747188ef3e73 Mon Sep 1
12 matches
Mail list logo
