On 4/26/21 3:05 PM, Patrick Palka wrote:
On Mon, 26 Apr 2021, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 4/26/21 12:17 PM, Patrick Palka wrote:
During constexpr evaluation, a base-to-derived conversion may yield an
expression like (Derived*)(&D.2217.D.2106 p+ -4) where D.2217 is the
derived object and D.2106 is
On Mon, 26 Apr 2021, Jason Merrill wrote:
> On 4/26/21 12:17 PM, Patrick Palka wrote:
> > During constexpr evaluation, a base-to-derived conversion may yield an
> > expression like (Derived*)(&D.2217.D.2106 p+ -4) where D.2217 is the
> > derived object and D.2106 is the base. But cxx_fold_indirec
On 4/26/21 12:17 PM, Patrick Palka wrote:
During constexpr evaluation, a base-to-derived conversion may yield an
expression like (Derived*)(&D.2217.D.2106 p+ -4) where D.2217 is the
derived object and D.2106 is the base. But cxx_fold_indirect_ref
doesn't know how to resolve an INDIRECT_REF there
During constexpr evaluation, a base-to-derived conversion may yield an
expression like (Derived*)(&D.2217.D.2106 p+ -4) where D.2217 is the
derived object and D.2106 is the base. But cxx_fold_indirect_ref
doesn't know how to resolve an INDIRECT_REF thereof to just D.2217,
because it doesn't handle
