On Thu, Jul 17, 2025 at 06:44:08PM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
> Hmm, perhaps, for stateful evaluation like define_aggregate. But we could
> address that with a flag on the STATIC_ASSERT like this patch puts on the
> STMT_EXPR.
Sure.
Jakub
On 7/17/25 6:25 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Thu, Jul 17, 2025 at 05:31:27PM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 7/16/25 10:49 AM, Marek Polacek wrote:
Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, ok for trunk?
-- >8 --
This patch implements consteval blocks, as specified by P2996.
They aren't ver
On Thu, Jul 17, 2025 at 05:31:27PM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
> On 7/16/25 10:49 AM, Marek Polacek wrote:
> > Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, ok for trunk?
> >
> > -- >8 --
> > This patch implements consteval blocks, as specified by P2996.
> > They aren't very useful without define
On 7/16/25 10:49 AM, Marek Polacek wrote:
Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, ok for trunk?
-- >8 --
This patch implements consteval blocks, as specified by P2996.
They aren't very useful without define_aggregate, but having
a reviewed implementation on trunk would be great.
consteva
Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, ok for trunk?
-- >8 --
This patch implements consteval blocks, as specified by P2996.
They aren't very useful without define_aggregate, but having
a reviewed implementation on trunk would be great.
consteval {} can be anywhere where a member-declarat
