On Fri, Jul 30, 2021 at 3:35 PM Andrew Pinski wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 30, 2021 at 9:26 AM Jason Merrill via Gcc-patches
> wrote:
> >
> > In discussion of jakub's patch for C++20 pointer-interconvertibility, it
> > came up that we allow anonymous structs to have bases, but don't do
> anything
> > us
On Fri, Jul 30, 2021 at 9:26 AM Jason Merrill via Gcc-patches
wrote:
>
> In discussion of jakub's patch for C++20 pointer-interconvertibility, it
> came up that we allow anonymous structs to have bases, but don't do anything
> usable with them. Let's reject it.
>
> The comment change is something
In discussion of jakub's patch for C++20 pointer-interconvertibility, it
came up that we allow anonymous structs to have bases, but don't do anything
usable with them. Let's reject it.
The comment change is something I noticed while looking for the right place
to diagnose this: finish_struct_anon
