Hi Jason,
On Thu Apr 10, 2025 at 10:42 PM CEST, Jason Merrill wrote:
> On 9/6/24 7:15 AM, Simon Martin wrote:
>> We ICE upon the following *valid* code when mangling the requires
>> clause
>>
>> === cut here ===
>> template struct s1 {
>>enum { e1 = 1 };
>> };
>> template struct s2 {
>>
On 9/6/24 7:15 AM, Simon Martin wrote:
We ICE upon the following *valid* code when mangling the requires
clause
=== cut here ===
template struct s1 {
enum { e1 = 1 };
};
template struct s2 {
enum { e1 = s1::e1 };
s2() requires(0 != e1) {}
};
s2<8> a;
=== cut here ===
The problem is t
We ICE upon the following *valid* code when mangling the requires
clause
=== cut here ===
template struct s1 {
enum { e1 = 1 };
};
template struct s2 {
enum { e1 = s1::e1 };
s2() requires(0 != e1) {}
};
s2<8> a;
=== cut here ===
The problem is that the mangler wrongly assumes that the DEC
