On Mon, Sep 26, 2022 at 05:02:36PM +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Sept 2022 at 16:23, Marek Polacek wrote:
> >
> > Jon reported that evaluating __is_convertible in this test leads to
> > instantiating char_traits::eq, which is invalid (because we
> > are trying to call a member function
On 9/26/22 11:51, Patrick Palka wrote:
On Mon, 26 Sep 2022, Marek Polacek via Gcc-patches wrote:
Jon reported that evaluating __is_convertible in this test leads to
instantiating char_traits::eq, which is invalid (because we
are trying to call a member function on a char) and so we fail to
comp
On Mon, 26 Sept 2022 at 16:23, Marek Polacek wrote:
>
> Jon reported that evaluating __is_convertible in this test leads to
> instantiating char_traits::eq, which is invalid (because we
> are trying to call a member function on a char)
N.B. in the original code wasn't trying to do something dumb l
On Mon, 26 Sep 2022, Marek Polacek via Gcc-patches wrote:
> Jon reported that evaluating __is_convertible in this test leads to
> instantiating char_traits::eq, which is invalid (because we
> are trying to call a member function on a char) and so we fail to
> compile the test. __is_convertible do
Jon reported that evaluating __is_convertible in this test leads to
instantiating char_traits::eq, which is invalid (because we
are trying to call a member function on a char) and so we fail to
compile the test. __is_convertible doesn't and shouldn't need to
instantiate so much, so let's limit it
