On 4/13/20 7:43 PM, Marek Polacek wrote:
While reviewing [basic.scope.param] I noticed we don't show the location
of the previous declaration when giving an error about "A parameter name
shall not be redeclared in the outermost block of the function definition".
Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-
While reviewing [basic.scope.param] I noticed we don't show the location
of the previous declaration when giving an error about "A parameter name
shall not be redeclared in the outermost block of the function definition".
Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, ok for trunk?
PR c++
