On 9/11/24 10:53 AM, Patrick Palka wrote:
On Wed, 11 Sep 2024, Patrick Palka wrote:
On Wed, 11 Sep 2024, Patrick Palka wrote:
On Wed, 4 Sep 2024, Marek Polacek wrote:
On Wed, Sep 04, 2024 at 10:58:25AM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 9/3/24 6:12 PM, Marek Polacek wrote:
Bootstrapped/regtes
On Wed, 11 Sep 2024, Patrick Palka wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Sep 2024, Patrick Palka wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 4 Sep 2024, Marek Polacek wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, Sep 04, 2024 at 10:58:25AM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
> > > > On 9/3/24 6:12 PM, Marek Polacek wrote:
> > > > > Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64
On Wed, 11 Sep 2024, Patrick Palka wrote:
> On Wed, 4 Sep 2024, Marek Polacek wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Sep 04, 2024 at 10:58:25AM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
> > > On 9/3/24 6:12 PM, Marek Polacek wrote:
> > > > Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, ok for trunk/14?
> > >
> > > The change t
On Wed, 4 Sep 2024, Marek Polacek wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 04, 2024 at 10:58:25AM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
> > On 9/3/24 6:12 PM, Marek Polacek wrote:
> > > Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, ok for trunk/14?
> >
> > The change to return bool seems like unrelated cleanup; please push t
On Wed, Sep 04, 2024 at 10:58:25AM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
> On 9/3/24 6:12 PM, Marek Polacek wrote:
> > Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, ok for trunk/14?
>
> The change to return bool seems like unrelated cleanup; please push that
> separately on trunk only.
Done.
> > + /
On 9/3/24 6:12 PM, Marek Polacek wrote:
Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, ok for trunk/14?
The change to return bool seems like unrelated cleanup; please push that
separately on trunk only.
+ /* We can also have:
+
+ template typename X>
+ void
Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, ok for trunk/14?
-- >8 --
We crash when dependent_type_p gets a TEMPLATE_TYPE_PARM outside
a template. That happens here because in
template typename X>
void func() {}
template
struct Y {};
void g() { func(); }
when performing overload
