On 6/5/24 05:20, Simon Martin wrote:
On 5 Jun 2024, at 10:34, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Wed, Jun 05, 2024 at 08:13:14AM +, Simon Martin wrote:
--- a/gcc/cp/decl.cc
+++ b/gcc/cp/decl.cc
@@ -2792,10 +2792,13 @@ duplicate_decls (tree newdecl, tree olddecl,
bool hiding, bool was_hidden)
be on the next line, not at the end of a
> line.
> See https://gcc.gnu.org/codingconventions.html and
> https://gcc.gnu.org/codingconventions.html
Indeed, thanks. This is fixed in the attached updated patch.
Simon
>
> Jakub
From e75602d3ce998307749e5022d989b564a6d19703 Mon Se
On Wed, Jun 05, 2024 at 08:13:14AM +, Simon Martin wrote:
> --- a/gcc/cp/decl.cc
> +++ b/gcc/cp/decl.cc
> @@ -2792,10 +2792,13 @@ duplicate_decls (tree newdecl, tree olddecl, bool
> hiding, bool was_hidden)
> retrofit_lang_decl (newdecl);
> tree alias = DECL_LOCAL_DECL_ALIAS (n
"cannot have cv-qualifier" {} { target *-*-* } line_4 }
> +// { dg-error "ambiguating new declaration of" {} { target *-*-* }
> line_4 }
> +// { dg-error "outside class declaration" {} { target *-*-* } line_5
> }
> --
> 2.44.0
From e75602d3ce998307749e5022d989b564a6d19703 Mon
We currently ICE upon the following because we don't properly handle local
functions with an error_mark_node as DECL_LOCAL_DECL_ALIAS in duplicate_decls.
=== cut here ===
void f (void) {
virtual int f (void) const;
virtual int f (void);
}
=== cut here ===
This patch fixes this by checking for
