On 12/18/24 10:53 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Tue, Dec 17, 2024 at 05:54:36PM -0500, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 9/5/24 3:27 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
When adding test coverage for maybe_unused attribute, I've run into
several things:
1) similarly to deprecated attribute, the attribute shouldn't ped
On Tue, Dec 17, 2024 at 05:54:36PM -0500, Jason Merrill wrote:
> On 9/5/24 3:27 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > When adding test coverage for maybe_unused attribute, I've run into
> > several things:
> > 1) similarly to deprecated attribute, the attribute shouldn't pedantically
> > appertain to ty
On 9/5/24 3:27 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
Hi!
When adding test coverage for maybe_unused attribute, I've run into
several things:
1) similarly to deprecated attribute, the attribute shouldn't pedantically
appertain to types other than class/enumeration definitions
2) similarly to deprecated at
Hi!
When adding test coverage for maybe_unused attribute, I've run into
several things:
1) similarly to deprecated attribute, the attribute shouldn't pedantically
appertain to types other than class/enumeration definitions
2) similarly to deprecated attribute, the attribute shouldn't pedantical
