On 11/28/23 12:12, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Tue, Nov 28, 2023 at 04:45:41PM +, Alex Coplan wrote:
--- gcc/cp/cp-objcp-common.cc.jj2023-11-27 17:34:25.0 +0100
+++ gcc/cp/cp-objcp-common.cc 2023-11-28 08:55:18.868419864 +0100
@@ -145,7 +145,7 @@ static constexpr cp_feature_inf
On Tue, Nov 28, 2023 at 04:45:41PM +, Alex Coplan wrote:
> > --- gcc/cp/cp-objcp-common.cc.jj2023-11-27 17:34:25.0 +0100
> > +++ gcc/cp/cp-objcp-common.cc 2023-11-28 08:55:18.868419864 +0100
> > @@ -145,7 +145,7 @@ static constexpr cp_feature_info cp_feat
> >{ "cxx_context
On 11/28/23 03:22, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Mon, Nov 27, 2023 at 10:58:04AM +, Alex Coplan wrote:
Many thanks both for the reviews, this is now pushed (with Jason's
above changes implemented) as g:06280a906cb3dc80cf5e07cf3335b758848d488d.
The new test FAILs everywhere with GXX_TESTSUITE_STD
On 28/11/2023 09:22, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 27, 2023 at 10:58:04AM +, Alex Coplan wrote:
> > Many thanks both for the reviews, this is now pushed (with Jason's
> > above changes implemented) as g:06280a906cb3dc80cf5e07cf3335b758848d488d.
>
> The new test FAILs everywhere with GXX_T
On Mon, Nov 27, 2023 at 10:58:04AM +, Alex Coplan wrote:
> Many thanks both for the reviews, this is now pushed (with Jason's
> above changes implemented) as g:06280a906cb3dc80cf5e07cf3335b758848d488d.
The new test FAILs everywhere with GXX_TESTSUITE_STDS=98,11,14,17,20,2b
I'm normally using f
