Re: [PATCH] c++: Fix spelling of non-static

2020-05-07 Thread Martin Sebor via Gcc-patches
On 5/7/20 12:44 PM, Marek Polacek wrote: On Thu, May 07, 2020 at 12:34:44PM -0600, Martin Sebor wrote: On 5/7/20 11:24 AM, Marek Polacek wrote: On Thu, Mar 19, 2020 at 12:51:42PM -0400, Marek Polacek via Gcc-patches wrote: On Thu, Mar 19, 2020 at 10:45:01AM -0600, Martin Sebor via Gcc-patches

Re: [PATCH] c++: Fix spelling of non-static

2020-05-07 Thread Marek Polacek via Gcc-patches
On Thu, May 07, 2020 at 12:34:44PM -0600, Martin Sebor wrote: > On 5/7/20 11:24 AM, Marek Polacek wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 19, 2020 at 12:51:42PM -0400, Marek Polacek via Gcc-patches > > wrote: > > > On Thu, Mar 19, 2020 at 10:45:01AM -0600, Martin Sebor via Gcc-patches > > > wrote: > > > > On 3/19

Re: [PATCH] c++: Fix spelling of non-static

2020-05-07 Thread Martin Sebor via Gcc-patches
On 5/7/20 11:24 AM, Marek Polacek wrote: On Thu, Mar 19, 2020 at 12:51:42PM -0400, Marek Polacek via Gcc-patches wrote: On Thu, Mar 19, 2020 at 10:45:01AM -0600, Martin Sebor via Gcc-patches wrote: On 3/19/20 9:48 AM, Marek Polacek via Gcc-patches wrote: I was looking at DR 296 and noticed tha

Re: [PATCH] c++: Fix spelling of non-static

2020-05-07 Thread Marek Polacek via Gcc-patches
On Thu, Mar 19, 2020 at 12:51:42PM -0400, Marek Polacek via Gcc-patches wrote: > On Thu, Mar 19, 2020 at 10:45:01AM -0600, Martin Sebor via Gcc-patches wrote: > > On 3/19/20 9:48 AM, Marek Polacek via Gcc-patches wrote: > > > I was looking at DR 296 and noticed that we say "nonstatic" instead of >

Re: [PATCH] c++: Fix spelling of non-static

2020-03-19 Thread Marek Polacek via Gcc-patches
On Thu, Mar 19, 2020 at 10:45:01AM -0600, Martin Sebor via Gcc-patches wrote: > On 3/19/20 9:48 AM, Marek Polacek via Gcc-patches wrote: > > I was looking at DR 296 and noticed that we say "nonstatic" instead of > > "non-static", which is the version the standard uses. So this patch > > fixes the

Re: [PATCH] c++: Fix spelling of non-static

2020-03-19 Thread Martin Sebor via Gcc-patches
On 3/19/20 9:48 AM, Marek Polacek via Gcc-patches wrote: I was looking at DR 296 and noticed that we say "nonstatic" instead of "non-static", which is the version the standard uses. So this patch fixes the spelling throughout the front end. Did not check e.g. non-dependent or any other. Bootst

Re: [PATCH] c++: Fix spelling of non-static

2020-03-19 Thread Jason Merrill via Gcc-patches
On 3/19/20 11:48 AM, Marek Polacek wrote: I was looking at DR 296 and noticed that we say "nonstatic" instead of "non-static", which is the version the standard uses. So this patch fixes the spelling throughout the front end. Did not check e.g. non-dependent or any other. Bootstrapped/regteste

[PATCH] c++: Fix spelling of non-static

2020-03-19 Thread Marek Polacek via Gcc-patches
I was looking at DR 296 and noticed that we say "nonstatic" instead of "non-static", which is the version the standard uses. So this patch fixes the spelling throughout the front end. Did not check e.g. non-dependent or any other. Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux, ok for trunk? *