Re: [PATCH] c++: Fix mangling of otherwise unattached class-scope lambdas [PR116568]

2024-10-14 Thread Nathaniel Shead
On Fri, Oct 11, 2024 at 10:37:11AM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote: > On 9/5/24 11:02 AM, Nathaniel Shead wrote: > > Bootstrapped and regtested (so far just dg.exp) on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, > > OK for trunk if full regtest passes? Or would it be better to try to > > implement all the rules mentioned in

Re: [PATCH] c++: Fix mangling of otherwise unattached class-scope lambdas [PR116568]

2024-10-11 Thread Jason Merrill
On 9/5/24 11:02 AM, Nathaniel Shead wrote: Bootstrapped and regtested (so far just dg.exp) on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, OK for trunk if full regtest passes? Or would it be better to try to implement all the rules mentioned in the linked pull request for one commit; I admit I haven't looked very close

[PATCH] c++: Fix mangling of otherwise unattached class-scope lambdas [PR116568]

2024-09-05 Thread Nathaniel Shead
Bootstrapped and regtested (so far just dg.exp) on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, OK for trunk if full regtest passes? Or would it be better to try to implement all the rules mentioned in the linked pull request for one commit; I admit I haven't looked very closely yet at how else we diverge? -- >8 -- Thi