On 6/10/21 5:19 PM, Marek Polacek wrote:
On Thu, Jun 10, 2021 at 03:09:29PM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 6/8/21 8:25 PM, Marek Polacek wrote:
We weren't passing 'flags' to the recursive call to cp_parser_declarator
in the ptr-operator case and as an effect, delayed parsing of noexcept
didn't
On Thu, Jun 10, 2021 at 03:09:29PM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
> On 6/8/21 8:25 PM, Marek Polacek wrote:
> > We weren't passing 'flags' to the recursive call to cp_parser_declarator
> > in the ptr-operator case and as an effect, delayed parsing of noexcept
> > didn't work as advertised. The follow
On 6/8/21 8:25 PM, Marek Polacek wrote:
We weren't passing 'flags' to the recursive call to cp_parser_declarator
in the ptr-operator case and as an effect, delayed parsing of noexcept
didn't work as advertised. The following change passes more than just
CP_PARSER_FLAGS_DELAY_NOEXCEPT but that do
We weren't passing 'flags' to the recursive call to cp_parser_declarator
in the ptr-operator case and as an effect, delayed parsing of noexcept
didn't work as advertised. The following change passes more than just
CP_PARSER_FLAGS_DELAY_NOEXCEPT but that doesn't seem to break anything.
I'm not pas
