On 7/16/21 1:44 PM, Marek Polacek wrote:
On Fri, Jul 16, 2021 at 12:53:05PM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 7/15/21 5:14 PM, Marek Polacek wrote:
The combination of DR 2481 and DR 2126 should allow us to do
void f()
{
constexpr const int &r = 42;
static_assert(r == 42);
On Fri, Jul 16, 2021 at 12:53:05PM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
> On 7/15/21 5:14 PM, Marek Polacek wrote:
> > The combination of DR 2481 and DR 2126 should allow us to do
> >
> >void f()
> >{
> > constexpr const int &r = 42;
> > static_assert(r == 42);
> >}
> >
> > because [
On 7/15/21 5:14 PM, Marek Polacek wrote:
The combination of DR 2481 and DR 2126 should allow us to do
void f()
{
constexpr const int &r = 42;
static_assert(r == 42);
}
because [expr.const]/4.7 now says that "a temporary object of
non-volatile const-qualified literal type whos
The combination of DR 2481 and DR 2126 should allow us to do
void f()
{
constexpr const int &r = 42;
static_assert(r == 42);
}
because [expr.const]/4.7 now says that "a temporary object of
non-volatile const-qualified literal type whose lifetime is extended to
that of a variable tha
