On 8/27/20 6:19 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Thu, 27 Aug 2020, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Fri, Jul 31, 2020 at 04:28:05PM -0400, Jason Merrill via Gcc-patches wrote:
On 7/31/20 6:06 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Fri, Jul 31, 2020 at 10:54:46AM +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
Does the standard requi
Excerpts from Jakub Jelinek's message of August 27, 2020 12:06 pm:
> On Fri, Jul 31, 2020 at 04:28:05PM -0400, Jason Merrill via Gcc-patches wrote:
>> On 7/31/20 6:06 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>> > On Fri, Jul 31, 2020 at 10:54:46AM +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>> > > > Does the standard require th
On 27/08/20 13:17 +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 12:06:59PM +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 27/08/20 12:46 +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 12:06:13PM +0200, Jakub Jelinek via Gcc-patches wrote:
>
> Oops, rewrote the testcase from __builtin_bit_cast to
On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 12:06:59PM +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On 27/08/20 12:46 +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 12:06:13PM +0200, Jakub Jelinek via Gcc-patches
> > wrote:
> >
> > Oops, rewrote the testcase from __builtin_bit_cast to std::bit_cast without
> > adjusting
On 27/08/20 12:46 +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 12:06:13PM +0200, Jakub Jelinek via Gcc-patches wrote:
Oops, rewrote the testcase from __builtin_bit_cast to std::bit_cast without
adjusting the syntax properly.
Also, let's not use bitfields in there, as clang doesn't support
On 27/08/20 12:06 +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Fri, Jul 31, 2020 at 04:28:05PM -0400, Jason Merrill via Gcc-patches wrote:
On 7/31/20 6:06 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 31, 2020 at 10:54:46AM +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> > > Does the standard require that somewhere? Because that i
On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 12:06:13PM +0200, Jakub Jelinek via Gcc-patches wrote:
Oops, rewrote the testcase from __builtin_bit_cast to std::bit_cast without
adjusting the syntax properly.
Also, let's not use bitfields in there, as clang doesn't support those.
So, adjusted testcase below. clang++ re
On Thu, 27 Aug 2020, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 31, 2020 at 04:28:05PM -0400, Jason Merrill via Gcc-patches wrote:
> > On 7/31/20 6:06 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jul 31, 2020 at 10:54:46AM +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> > > > > Does the standard require that somewhere? Becaus
On Fri, Jul 31, 2020 at 04:28:05PM -0400, Jason Merrill via Gcc-patches wrote:
> On 7/31/20 6:06 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 31, 2020 at 10:54:46AM +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> > > > Does the standard require that somewhere? Because that is not what the
> > > > compiler implements
On 7/31/20 6:06 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Fri, Jul 31, 2020 at 10:54:46AM +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
Does the standard require that somewhere? Because that is not what the
compiler implements right now.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78620
But does that imply that all CON
On Fri, Jul 31, 2020 at 10:54:46AM +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> > Does the standard require that somewhere? Because that is not what the
> > compiler implements right now.
>
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78620
Ah, ok.
But does that imply that all CONSTRUCTORs without CONSTRUC
On 31/07/20 10:19 +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 05:59:18PM -0400, Jason Merrill via Gcc-patches wrote:
> Even if we are guaranteed that (what guarantees it?) when __builtin_bit_cast
> is constexpr evaluated no initializer will be omitted if may be value
initialized
> to so
On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 05:59:18PM -0400, Jason Merrill via Gcc-patches wrote:
> > Even if we are guaranteed that (what guarantees it?) when __builtin_bit_cast
> > is constexpr evaluated no initializer will be omitted if may be value
> > initialized
> > to something other than all zeros,
>
> This
On 7/30/20 10:57 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 10:16:46AM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
It checks the various std::bit_cast requirements, when not constexpr
evaluated acts pretty much like VIEW_CONVERT_EXPR of the source argument
to the destination type and the hardest part is o
On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 10:16:46AM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
> > It checks the various std::bit_cast requirements, when not constexpr
> > evaluated acts pretty much like VIEW_CONVERT_EXPR of the source argument
> > to the destination type and the hardest part is obviously the constexpr
> > evalua
On 7/18/20 2:50 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
Hi!
The following patch adds __builtin_bit_cast builtin, similarly to
clang or MSVC which implement std::bit_cast using such an builtin too.
Great!
It checks the various std::bit_cast requirements, when not constexpr
evaluated acts pretty much like VI
> On Jul 18, 2020, at 2:50 PM, Jakub Jelinek via Gcc-patches
> wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> The following patch adds __builtin_bit_cast builtin, similarly to
> clang or MSVC which implement std::bit_cast using such an builtin too.
> It checks the various std::bit_cast requirements, when not constexpr
Hi!
The following patch adds __builtin_bit_cast builtin, similarly to
clang or MSVC which implement std::bit_cast using such an builtin too.
It checks the various std::bit_cast requirements, when not constexpr
evaluated acts pretty much like VIEW_CONVERT_EXPR of the source argument
to the destinat
18 matches
Mail list logo
