Re: [PATCH] c++/modules: fix up recent testcases

2023-10-25 Thread Jason Merrill
On 10/25/23 14:32, Patrick Palka wrote: Tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, does this look OK for trunk? Declaring get() inline seems necessary to avoid link failure: /usr/bin/ld: /tmp/ccwdv6Co.o: in function `g3@pr105322.Decltype()': decltype-1_b.C:(.text._ZW8pr105322W8Decltype2g3v[_ZW8pr105

Re: [PATCH] c++/modules: fix up recent testcases

2023-10-25 Thread Nathan Sidwell
Patrick, thanks for noticing this, and this is a suitable workaround for another bug. We should either be emitting the definition of that member function in the object file of its containing function. Or it should be implicitly inline. I know in module perview the in-class defined member fun

[PATCH] c++/modules: fix up recent testcases

2023-10-25 Thread Patrick Palka
Tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, does this look OK for trunk? Declaring get() inline seems necessary to avoid link failure: /usr/bin/ld: /tmp/ccwdv6Co.o: in function `g3@pr105322.Decltype()': decltype-1_b.C:(.text._ZW8pr105322W8Decltype2g3v[_ZW8pr105322W8Decltype2g3v]+0x18): undefined referen