Re: [PATCH] c++/modules: Fix merging of GM entities in partitions [PR114950]

On Wed, Aug 07, 2024 at 08:45:03PM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote: > On 8/7/24 7:22 PM, Nathaniel Shead wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 07, 2024 at 04:18:47PM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote: > > > On 8/5/24 9:16 AM, Nathaniel Shead wrote: > > > > Bootstrapped and regtested (so far just modules.exp) on > > > > x86_6

Re: [PATCH] c++/modules: Fix merging of GM entities in partitions [PR114950]

On 8/7/24 7:22 PM, Nathaniel Shead wrote: On Wed, Aug 07, 2024 at 04:18:47PM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote: On 8/5/24 9:16 AM, Nathaniel Shead wrote: Bootstrapped and regtested (so far just modules.exp) on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, OK for trunk if full regtest passes? OK. @@ -11316,6 +11319,7 @@ tr

Re: [PATCH] c++/modules: Fix merging of GM entities in partitions [PR114950]

On Wed, Aug 07, 2024 at 04:18:47PM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote: > On 8/5/24 9:16 AM, Nathaniel Shead wrote: > > Bootstrapped and regtested (so far just modules.exp) on > > x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, OK for trunk if full regtest passes? > > OK. > > > -- >8 -- > > > > Currently name lookup generally seem

Re: [PATCH] c++/modules: Fix merging of GM entities in partitions [PR114950]

On 8/5/24 9:16 AM, Nathaniel Shead wrote: Bootstrapped and regtested (so far just modules.exp) on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, OK for trunk if full regtest passes? OK. -- >8 -- Currently name lookup generally seems to assume that all entities declared within a named module (partition) are attached t

[PATCH] c++/modules: Fix merging of GM entities in partitions [PR114950]

Bootstrapped and regtested (so far just modules.exp) on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, OK for trunk if full regtest passes? -- >8 -- Currently name lookup generally seems to assume that all entities declared within a named module (partition) are attached to said module, which is not true for GM entities (e