> On 10 Dec 2024, at 01:02, Jason Merrill wrote:
>
> On 12/9/24 2:39 PM, Iain Sandoe wrote:
>>> On 9 Dec 2024, at 19:34, Jason Merrill wrote:
>>>
>>> On 12/9/24 2:00 PM, Iain Sandoe wrote:
> On 9 Dec 2024, at 18:56, Jason Merrill wrote:
>
> On 11/29/24 8:47 AM, Iain Sandoe wrote
On 12/9/24 2:39 PM, Iain Sandoe wrote:
On 9 Dec 2024, at 19:34, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 12/9/24 2:00 PM, Iain Sandoe wrote:
On 9 Dec 2024, at 18:56, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 11/29/24 8:47 AM, Iain Sandoe wrote:
Tested on x86_64-darwin, x86_64-linux,
OK for trunk?
thanks
Iain
--- 8< ---
At
> On 9 Dec 2024, at 19:34, Jason Merrill wrote:
>
> On 12/9/24 2:00 PM, Iain Sandoe wrote:
>>> On 9 Dec 2024, at 18:56, Jason Merrill wrote:
>>>
>>> On 11/29/24 8:47 AM, Iain Sandoe wrote:
Tested on x86_64-darwin, x86_64-linux,
OK for trunk?
thanks
Iain
--- 8< ---
>>
On 12/9/24 2:00 PM, Iain Sandoe wrote:
On 9 Dec 2024, at 18:56, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 11/29/24 8:47 AM, Iain Sandoe wrote:
Tested on x86_64-darwin, x86_64-linux,
OK for trunk?
thanks
Iain
--- 8< ---
At present, we only update the suspend index when we actually are
at the stage that the co
> On 9 Dec 2024, at 18:56, Jason Merrill wrote:
>
> On 11/29/24 8:47 AM, Iain Sandoe wrote:
>> Tested on x86_64-darwin, x86_64-linux,
>> OK for trunk?
>> thanks
>> Iain
>> --- 8< ---
>> At present, we only update the suspend index when we actually are
>> at the stage that the coroutine is cons
On 11/29/24 8:47 AM, Iain Sandoe wrote:
Tested on x86_64-darwin, x86_64-linux,
OK for trunk?
thanks
Iain
--- 8< ---
At present, we only update the suspend index when we actually are
at the stage that the coroutine is considered suspended. This is
on the basis that it is UB to resume or destroy
Tested on x86_64-darwin, x86_64-linux,
OK for trunk?
thanks
Iain
--- 8< ---
At present, we only update the suspend index when we actually are
at the stage that the coroutine is considered suspended. This is
on the basis that it is UB to resume or destroy a coroutines that
is not suspended (and th
