On 11/29/24 8:43 AM, Iain Sandoe wrote:
Tested on x86_64-darwin, x86_64/powerpc64-linux, on folly and more
widely by Sam. There are possibly additional BZ dups that will be
covered (this fixes 117231, a P1). OK for trunk?
thanks
Iain
--- 8< ---
In the current implementation, statement expressi
Tested on x86_64-darwin, x86_64/powerpc64-linux, on folly and more
widely by Sam. There are possibly additional BZ dups that will be
covered (this fixes 117231, a P1). OK for trunk?
thanks
Iain
--- 8< ---
In the current implementation, statement expressions were intentionally
unsupported (as a C