Hi Jason,
> On 10 Sep 2024, at 20:22, Jason Merrill wrote:
>
> On 9/7/24 6:45 AM, Iain Sandoe wrote:
>> As noted in the PR the action of the existing implementation was to
>> treat a false value from await_suspend () as equivalent to "do not
>> suspend". Actually it needs to be the equivalent o
On 9/7/24 6:45 AM, Iain Sandoe wrote:
As noted in the PR the action of the existing implementation was to
treat a false value from await_suspend () as equivalent to "do not
suspend". Actually it needs to be the equivalent of "resume" - and
we need to restart the dispatcher - since the await_susp
Tested on x86_64-darwin, powerpc64le-linux, OK for trunk?
--- 8< ---
As noted in the PR the action of the existing implementation was to
treat a false value from await_suspend () as equivalent to "do not
suspend". Actually it needs to be the equivalent of "resume" - and
we need to restart the d
