Re: [PATCH] bpf: create modifier for mem operand for xchg and cmpxchg

Fixed and pushed! Thanks, Cupertino David Faust writes: > On 7/15/24 08:33, Cupertino Miranda wrote: >> Both xchg and cmpxchg instructions, in the pseudo-C dialect, do not >> expect their memory address operand to be surrounded by parentheses. >> For example, it should be output as "w0 =cmpxch

Re: [PATCH] bpf: create modifier for mem operand for xchg and cmpxchg

On 7/15/24 08:33, Cupertino Miranda wrote: > Both xchg and cmpxchg instructions, in the pseudo-C dialect, do not > expect their memory address operand to be surrounded by parentheses. > For example, it should be output as "w0 =cmpxchg32_32(r8+8,w0,w2)" > instead of "w0 =cmpxchg32_32((r8+8),w0,w2)".

[PATCH] bpf: create modifier for mem operand for xchg and cmpxchg

Both xchg and cmpxchg instructions, in the pseudo-C dialect, do not expect their memory address operand to be surrounded by parentheses. For example, it should be output as "w0 =cmpxchg32_32(r8+8,w0,w2)" instead of "w0 =cmpxchg32_32((r8+8),w0,w2)". This patch implements an operand modifier 'M' whi