Re: [PATCH] better handling of ranges (PR 78703)

2017-01-12 Thread Jeff Law
On 01/09/2017 09:18 AM, Martin Sebor wrote: On 01/08/2017 09:44 PM, Jeff Law wrote: On 12/23/2016 02:25 PM, Martin Sebor wrote: Bug 78703 points out that the decimal point character in floating directives can be longer than just one byte (in locales where the decimal point is a multibyte charac

Re: [PATCH] better handling of ranges (PR 78703)

2017-01-12 Thread Jeff Law
On 01/09/2017 09:18 AM, Martin Sebor wrote: On 01/08/2017 09:44 PM, Jeff Law wrote: As much as I hate to say it, I think we need to find a way to break this down into something more manageable. It's just impossible to see the structure of what you're doing with the implementation changes mixe

Re: [PATCH] better handling of ranges (PR 78703)

2017-01-08 Thread Jeff Law
On 12/23/2016 02:25 PM, Martin Sebor wrote: Bug 78703 points out that the decimal point character in floating directives can be longer than just one byte (in locales where the decimal point is a multibyte character). The decimal point can result in anywhere between 1 and MB_LEN_MAX bytes. This

Re: [PATCH] better handling of ranges (PR 78703)

2017-01-06 Thread Jeff Law
On 12/23/2016 02:25 PM, Martin Sebor wrote: Bug 78703 points out that the decimal point character in floating directives can be longer than just one byte (in locales where the decimal point is a multibyte character). The decimal point can result in anywhere between 1 and MB_LEN_MAX bytes. This

Re: [PATCH] better handling of ranges (PR 78703)

2016-12-23 Thread Markus Trippelsdorf
On 2016.12.23 at 14:25 -0700, Martin Sebor wrote: > Bug 78703 points out that the decimal point character in floating > directives can be longer than just one byte (in locales where the > decimal point is a multibyte character). The decimal point can > result in anywhere between 1 and MB_LEN_MAX b