On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 9:20 PM Martin Sebor via Gcc-patches
wrote:
>
> On 9/30/20 3:57 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 03:40:40PM -0600, Martin Sebor via Gcc-patches
> > wrote:
> >> I will commit this patch later this week unless I hear concerns
> >> or suggestions for chang
On 9/30/20 3:57 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 03:40:40PM -0600, Martin Sebor via Gcc-patches wrote:
I will commit this patch later this week unless I hear concerns
or suggestions for changes.
That is not how the patch review process works.
The review process hasn't been wo
On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 03:40:40PM -0600, Martin Sebor via Gcc-patches wrote:
> I will commit this patch later this week unless I hear concerns
> or suggestions for changes.
That is not how the patch review process works.
> + arat = tree_cons (get_identifier ("array"), flag, NULL_TREE);
Be
To render the bounds as well as the static specifier in array
and VLA function parameters the new -Warray-parameter and
-Wvla-parameter warning builds a "synthetic" array type that
corresponds to the form of the parameter, sets its qualifiers
to match those of the pointer, and passes it to the pr
